Search


Compare phones

Global Score
31.234
Basic Information
PantechNokia
--Symbian 9.1
2010-03-152006-09-26
4.54 x 2.40 x 0.39 inches3.74 x 2.04 x 0.79 inches
3.21 ounces4.35 ounces
$ 130.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches2.4 inches
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
167 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
66.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--61,44 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
1.320.5
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
--f/2.80 aperture
320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution--
4.735.5
UMTS, EDGE and GSMUMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.40.4
Battery Life
930mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
200 hours standby time
4.2 hours talk time
2.482.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0
GPS--
--Infra-red port
--FM Radio

Comparison review

Nokia N75 is a little bit better than the Pantech Link, with a 34 score against 31.2. The Nokia N75 is a noticeably older, extremely thicker and much heavier cellphone than Pantech Link. Nokia N75 counts with just a bit better looking display than Pantech Link. Both have a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen, a screen with the same size and the same exact 320 x 240 resolution.

Pantech Link counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia N75. The Pantech Link and the Nokia N75 have really similar processors, both of them have the same number of cores. Nokia N75 captures much clearer photos and videos than Pantech Link, because it has a way better resolution camera in the back.

The Pantech Link counts with superior battery performance than Nokia N75, because it has a 930mAh battery capacity.

In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Nokia N75 is also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.