Search


Compare phones

Global Score
29.331.7
Basic Information
PantechKyocera
--2011-07-25
4.02 x 1.97 x 0.78 inches4.00 x 2.10 x 1.00 inches
4.66 ounces5.10 ounces
$ 200.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
128 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.56.1
Performance
--Qualcomm QSC6085 chipset
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.32
Camera
1.30 MP3.20 MP
4.515.06
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.90.1
Battery Life
920mAh Li-Ion Battery1360mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
240 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
8.1 hours talk time
2.483.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPSGPS

Comparison review

The Kyocera DuraMax is just a bit better than Pantech Matrix, getting a overall score of 31.7 against 29.3. Despite being the best device we are comparing here, Kyocera DuraMax is a incredibly thicker and just a little heavier device than the Pantech Matrix. The Kyocera DuraMax features a brighter screen than Pantech Matrix, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 320 x 240px resolution and a lot more pixels per inch of screen.

Kyocera DuraMax features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Pantech Matrix. Kyocera DuraMax has a processing unit that's just as good as the Pantech Matrix one, both of them have a 0-Core CPU. The Kyocera DuraMax features a very superior battery performance than Pantech Matrix, because it has a 1360mAh battery capacity against 920mAh.

The Kyocera DuraMax takes better videos and photos than Pantech Matrix, because it has a camera with much more MP.

Kyocera DuraMax not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.