Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 29.3 | 31.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Pantech | Nokia |
| -- | 2010-06-03 |
| 4.02 x 1.97 x 0.78 inches | 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches |
| 4.66 ounces | 2.61 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| $ 200.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 1.8 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 128 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| -- | 16 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.67 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 10,24 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.52 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| -- | 128 x 96 (10 fps) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 3.74 |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.9 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 920mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1020mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 396 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.48 | 2.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia C2-00 is slightly better than the Pantech Matrix, with a 31.6 score against 29.3. Nokia C2-00 is a way lighter and a lot thinner device than the Pantech Matrix. Pantech Matrix features just a bit better screen than Nokia C2-00, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the display, a larger screen and a higher 220 x 176 pixels resolution.
Nokia C2-00 has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Pantech Matrix. The Pantech Matrix has just a bit better performance than Nokia C2-00. Both have a 0-Core processing unit. The Nokia C2-00 features a little better battery performance than Pantech Matrix, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
The Pantech Matrix features a much better camera than Nokia C2-00, because it has a lot more MP back camera.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Nokia C2-00 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.