Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Pantech | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.68 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Adreno 330 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 703 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is way better than the Pantech Vega Iron 2, with a global score of 81.3 against 62.6. The LG V35 ThinQ design is just a little bit heavier but just a little bit thinner than Pantech Vega Iron 2. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little faster processor than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because it has a better number of pixels per screen inch, a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a quite larger screen. The LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior camera than Pantech Vega Iron 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a camera with more megapixels.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a greater memory to store more apps and games than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because although it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB against 2 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. LG V35 ThinQ features a bit superior battery lifetime than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because it has a 2% more battery size.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more than Pantech Vega Iron 2, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.