Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Pantech | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-11 |
| 5.68 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold and Gray |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Adreno 330 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 703 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a lot better than Pantech Vega Iron 2, having an 81.9 score against 62.6. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is a notably thicker and a lot heavier cellphone than Pantech Vega Iron 2. The Galaxy S8 Active has a little sharper display than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 2960px resolution, a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a quite bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active and Pantech Vega Iron 2 both feature really similar CPUs, because although the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and more CPU cores. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a greater camera than Pantech Vega Iron 2, although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution and a worse video resolution.
The Pantech Vega Iron 2 counts with a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 2 TB. Galaxy S8 Active features greater battery lifetime than Pantech Vega Iron 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3220mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S8 Active is also cheaper than the Pantech Vega Iron 2.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.