Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 30.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| PCD | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2010-06-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 3.80 x 1.90 x 0.80 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 3.50 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Gray and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 128 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 5.85 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 4.51 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 920mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 330 hours standby time 4.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.48 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a lot better than PCD CDM8635, with a general score of 76.4 against 30.8. Motorola DROID Turbo's design is extremely newer and a lot thinner than PCD CDM8635's, although it's noticeably heavier. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much greater processing power than PCD CDM8635, because it has more CPU cores, 2,5 GB more RAM and an additional graphics co-processor.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a way better display than PCD CDM8635, because it has a lot better display density, a lot higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a way bigger screen. Motorola DROID Turbo shoots much better photos and videos than PCD CDM8635, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than PCD CDM8635. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a really longer battery life than PCD CDM8635, because it has a 3900mAh battery size against 920mAh.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo is also cheaper than the PCD CDM8635.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.