Search


Compare phones

Global Score
30.833.3
Basic Information
PCDNokia
2010-06-012006-11-28
3.80 x 1.90 x 0.80 inches4.14 x 1.74 x 0.73 inches
3.50 ounces2.96 ounces
$ 160.00$ 139.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches--
176 x 220 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
TFTSTN
128 pixels per inch137 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.65.7
processor processor
512 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
5.855.76
Storage
--5,12 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD external memory slot
00.2
Camera
1.30 MP0.30 MP
4.513.63
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.12.7
Battery Life
920mAh Li-Ion Battery970mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
330 hours standby time
4.2 hours talk time
240 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.482.56
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0

Comparison review

The Nokia 6086 is slightly better than the PCD CDM8635, having a 33.3 score against 30.8. Even though the Nokia 6086 is much older than the PCD CDM8635, it's design is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner. The PCD CDM8635 features a little better hardware performance than Nokia 6086. Both of them have a 0-Core CPU.

Nokia 6086 features a little more vivid display than PCD CDM8635, because although it has a lot worse 160 x 128 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixels quantity in each inch in the screen. The PCD CDM8635 features a way better camera than Nokia 6086, because it has a back camera with a way better resolution.

Nokia 6086 features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than PCD CDM8635. The Nokia 6086 features a little better battery performance than PCD CDM8635, because it has a 5% larger battery size.

Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Nokia 6086 is also cheap compared to the other phone.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.