Search


Compare phones

Global Score
30.833.3
Basic Information
PCDNokia
2010-06-012011-06-21
3.80 x 1.90 x 0.80 inches4.06 x 2.02 x 0.67 inches
3.50 ounces4.06 ounces
$ 160.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.6 inches
176 x 220 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTLCD
128 pixels per inch154 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.65.8
processor processor
512 MB RAM32 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.855.76
Storage
--10,24 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.52
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
4.514.73
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
920mAh Li-Ion Battery1020mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
330 hours standby time
4.2 hours talk time
600 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.482.64
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR

Comparison review

Nokia C2-02 has a score of 33.3, which is a little bit better than the PCD CDM8635's score of 30.8. The Nokia C2-02 is a newer and somewhat thinner device than the PCD CDM8635, but it is somewhat heavier. The Nokia C2-02 has a little bit better display than PCD CDM8635, because it has a better resolution of 320 x 240, a bigger display and a bit more pixels per inch in the display.

The Nokia C2-02 features a very superior memory for games and applications than PCD CDM8635, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 32 GB. PCD CDM8635 has a bit superior processor than Nokia C2-02, and although they both have the same number of cores, the PCD CDM8635 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.

The Nokia C2-02 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than PCD CDM8635, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels. Nokia C2-02 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than PCD CDM8635, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.

Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Nokia C2-02 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.