Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 30.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| PCD | Samsung |
| 2010-06-01 | 2018-03-16 |
| 3.80 x 1.90 x 0.80 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.50 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 128 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 5.85 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.51 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 920mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 4.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is a lot better than the PCD CDM8635's 30.8 global score. Galaxy S9 is a incredibly newer and much thinner cellphone than PCD CDM8635, although it is also heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much more powerful processor than PCD CDM8635, because it has more cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a lot better looking screen than PCD CDM8635, because it has a lot larger display, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a much greater pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than PCD CDM8635, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 400 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much longer battery performance than PCD CDM8635, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 920mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S9 captures much clearer photos and videos than PCD CDM8635, because it has a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy S9 is also cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.