Search


Compare phones

Global Score
27.345.6
Basic Information
PhilipsLG
--Android 2.2
--2010-11-22
3.92 x 1.65 x 0.53 inches4.57 x 2.22 x 0.62 inches
2.29 ounces5.39 ounces
$ 75.00$ 75.00
Display / Screen
1.5 inches3.2 inches
128 x 128 pixels 320 x 480 pixels
STNLCD
121 pixels per inch180 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.46.7
processor Single-Core 600 MHz processor
--512 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.84
Storage
--153,6 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
02.02
Camera
--3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution
05.17
Networks
--Wi-Fi
GPRS and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.22.5
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
500 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
337 hours standby time
7.5 hours talk time
2.243.28
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS
--Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The LG Optimus M is much better than Philips 198, having a 45.6 score against 27.3. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, LG Optimus M is a a lot heavier and thicker phone than the Philips 198. LG Optimus M counts with a lot better display than Philips 198, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a really bigger display and a much higher 480 x 320 resolution.

The LG Optimus M counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Philips 198, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 32 GB. The LG Optimus M features a superior hardware performance than Philips 198, because it has a larger number of faster cores.

LG Optimus M features a way better battery duration than Philips 198, because it has a 1500mAh battery capacity against 800mAh. The LG Optimus M counts with a greater camera than Philips 198.

LG Optimus M costs the same than the Philips 198, making it an easy decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.