Search


Compare phones

Global Score
32.635.5
Basic Information
PhilipsEten
--Windows Mobile Professional 6.0
--2007-05-08
4.17 x 1.92 x 0.38 inches4.44 x 2.34 x 0.61 inches
2.82 ounces5.14 ounces
$ 119.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
--2.8 inches
176 x 220 pixels 480 x 640 pixels (VGA)
TFTTFT
217 pixels per inch286 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
6.46.9
processorSamsung SC3 2442 (Single-Core 400 MHz) processor
--64 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.39
Storage
61,44 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.50
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
3.634.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.22.7
Battery Life
680mAh Li-Ion Battery1530mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
240 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
170 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
2.083.36
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Eten X500+ has a score of 35.5, which is a little bit better than Philips 292's overall score of 32.6. Despite being the best we are comparing, Eten X500+ is a noticeably heavier and thicker phone than Philips 292. Eten X500+ has a better performing processing unit than Philips 292, because it has 1 more processing cores.

Eten X500+ features a slightly better display than Philips 292, because it has a much better resolution of 640 x 480 pixels and a better amount of pixels per screen inch. The Eten X500+ captures much clearer videos and photos than Philips 292, because it has a much more megapixels camera. The Philips 292 has a very superior memory for applications and games than Eten X500+, although it has no SD memory slot.

The Eten X500+ has a much better battery life than Philips 292, because it has 1530mAh of battery capacity.

The Eten X500+ is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.