| Global Score | |
| 32.6 | 35.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Philips | Nokia |
| -- | 2007-05-31 |
| 4.17 x 1.92 x 0.38 inches | 4.32 x 1.77 x 0.37 inches |
| 2.82 ounces | 3.31 ounces |
| $ 119.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 217 pixels per inch | 200 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 6.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 61,44 MB internal memory | 1 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.5 | 1.4 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| -- | 220 x 176 video resolution |
| 3.63 | 4.73 |
| GPRS and GSM | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 680mAh Li-Ion Battery | 830mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 3 hours talk time | 216 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.32 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
Nokia 6500 classic is a little bit better than Philips 292, getting a general score of 35.2 against 32.6. The Nokia 6500 classic body is somewhat heavier but a little thinner than the Philips 292. The Nokia 6500 classic features a little sharper display than Philips 292, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a higher 320 x 240 resolution.
Nokia 6500 classic's processing unit is just as good as the Philips 292 one, both of them have a 0-Core CPU. Nokia 6500 classic captures way better pictures and videos than Philips 292, because it has a much more mega-pixels camera. The Nokia 6500 classic counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Philips 292, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 1 GB internal storage.
Nokia 6500 classic counts with improved battery duration than Philips 292, because it has 830mAh of battery capacity against 680mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Nokia 6500 classic is also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.