Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.335.9
Basic Information
PhilipsLG
--2008-06-11
4.13 x 1.85 x 0.54 inches4.10 x 2.20 x 0.50 inches
2.92 ounces3.76 ounces
$ 125.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
--3 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
182 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
ResistiveResistive
6.15.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
11,26 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.20
Camera
1.30 MP3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution
4.515.06
GPRS and GSMEV-DO A and CDMA
SIM--
0.20.2
Battery Life
980mAh Li-Ion Battery1100mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
655 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
360 hours standby time
4.7 hours talk time
2.562.72
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.1
--GPS
--Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The LG Dare has a general score of 35.9, which is a little bit better than Philips 392's general score of 33.3. The LG Dare construction is much heavier but a bit thinner than the Philips 392. Philips 392 counts with a slightly better display than LG Dare, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 320 x 240, it also counts with a bit greater pixel quantity per display inch.

LG Dare's CPU is just as good as the Philips 392 one, they have the same number of cores. The LG Dare captures much clearer photos and videos than Philips 392, because it has a back facing camera with a way better resolution. The Philips 392 has a very superior storage to install applications and games than LG Dare, although it has no SD memory slot.

LG Dare counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Philips 392, because it has 1100mAh of battery capacity.

Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, LG Dare is also very cheap compared to the other devices, making this phone an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.