Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 33.3 | 69.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Philips | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2019-03-20 |
| 4.13 x 1.85 x 0.54 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 2.92 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.7 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 182 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 11,26 MB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 11.36 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 8.58 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 980mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 655 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K40 is a lot better than Philips 392, with a global score of 69.8 against 33.3. The LG K40 design is noticeably thinner but much heavier than the Philips 392. The LG K40 has a more vivid display than Philips 392, because it has much more pixels per inch of display and a way better resolution of 720 x 1440 pixels.
LG K40 has a much greater memory for apps and games than Philips 392, because it has 15,99 GB more internal storage capacity. The LG K40 has a much better performing CPU than Philips 392, because it has a larger number of cores. The LG K40 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Philips 392, because it has a camera in the back with a much better 8 mega pixels resolution.
The LG K40 features a superior battery performance than Philips 392, because it has a 206% more battery size.
LG K40 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Philips 392, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.