Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.336.3
Basic Information
PhilipsSamsung
--2009-05-11
4.13 x 1.85 x 0.54 inches4.01 x 2.04 x 0.67 inches
2.92 ounces4.34 ounces
$ 125.00$ 110.00
Display / Screen
--2.6 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
182 pixels per inch154 pixels per inch
ResistiveNo touch screen
6.15.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
11,26 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.20
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
4.514.73
GPRS and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.20.1
Battery Life
980mAh Li-Ion Battery880mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
655 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
336 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.562.4
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.0
--GPS

Comparison review

Samsung Alias 2 is a little bit better than Philips 392, with a 36.3 score against 33.3. The Samsung Alias 2 construction is thicker and notably heavier than the Philips 392. Samsung Alias 2's processing unit is just as good as Philips 392's CPU, both have 0 CPU cores. Philips 392 features a bit sharper display than Samsung Alias 2, and although they both have the same exact resolution of 320 x 240px, the Philips 392 also has a just a little higher amount of pixels per inch of display.

Philips 392 features much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Alias 2, although it has no slot for external memory cards. The Philips 392 features a bit superior battery life than Samsung Alias 2, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.

Samsung Alias 2 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Philips 392, because it has a lot higher resolution camera in the back.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Alias 2 is also the cheapest, which makes it an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.