Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.371.4
Basic Information
PhilipsSamsung
--Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie
--2019-07-12
4.13 x 1.85 x 0.54 inches5.80 x 2.74 x 0.33 inches
2.92 ounces4.97 ounces
--Black
--Plastic and Plastic
$ 125.00$ 125.00
Display / Screen
--5.8 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)1560 x 720 pixels
TFTIPS LCD
182 pixels per inch296 pixels per inch
ResistiveNo touch screen
6.17.3
Performance
--Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset
processorARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor
--2 GB RAM
GPUMali-G71 MP2 GPU
5.768.73
Storage
11,26 MB internal memory32 GB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot
0.29.84
Camera
1.30 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
--f/1.90 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
4.518.47
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
GPRS and GSMLTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA
SIMNano SIM
0.26.7
Battery Life
980mAh Li-Ion Battery3000mAh Li - Ion Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
655 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
--
2.564.96
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 5.0
--GPS
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Samsung Galaxy A10e has a score of 71.4, which is much better than Philips 392's 33.3 global score. Samsung Galaxy A10e is a noticeably thinner but noticeably heavier cellphone than Philips 392. The Samsung Galaxy A10e features a better display than Philips 392, because it has a much higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a much better 720 x 1560 pixels resolution.

Galaxy A10e has a lot better processing power than Philips 392, because it has more processing cores. Galaxy A10e counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Philips 392, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A10e counts with a really longer battery life than Philips 392, because it has a 206 percent larger battery capacity.

Galaxy A10e counts with a lot better camera than Philips 392, because it has a much more mega pixels back camera.

The Galaxy A10e and the Philips 392 cost the same, making it a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.