Search


Compare phones

Philips 650
Global Score
23.838.1
Basic Information
PhilipsSamsung
--2010-03-15
3.46 x 1.81 x 0.96 inches4.16 x 2.31 x 0.57 inches
3.28 ounces3.99 ounces
$ 55.00$ 55.00
Display / Screen
--2.6 inches
128 x 160 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
STNTFT
--154 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
35.9
processor Single-Core 208 MHz processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
7,17 MB internal memory81,92 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.21.82
Camera
--2.00 MP
04.73
GPRS and GSMUMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.4
Battery Life
1100mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
720 hours standby time
8.5 hours talk time
250 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
2.722.56
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

Samsung Strive has an overall score of 38.1, which is way better than Philips 650's 23.8 global score. The Samsung Strive construction is heavier but noticeably thinner than the Philips 650. The Samsung Strive counts with a lot better display than Philips 650, because it has a way higher resolution of 320 x 240.

The Samsung Strive's processing unit is very similar to the Philips 650 one, although the Samsung Strive also has more cores. The Samsung Strive counts with a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Philips 650, because it has 74,75 MB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows up to 32 GB.

The Samsung Strive counts with a way better camera than Philips 650. The Philips 650 has a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Strive, because it has 1100mAh of battery capacity against 1000mAh.

Samsung Strive and the Philips 650 cost exactly the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.