Search


Compare phones

Global Score
32.935.5
Basic Information
PhilipsEten
--Windows Mobile Professional 6.0
--2007-05-08
4.09 x 1.88 x 0.58 inches4.44 x 2.34 x 0.61 inches
3.59 ounces5.14 ounces
$ 125.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches2.8 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)480 x 640 pixels (VGA)
TFTTFT
167 pixels per inch286 pixels per inch
ResistiveResistive
66.9
processorSamsung SC3 2442 (Single-Core 400 MHz) processor
--64 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.39
Storage
11,26 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.20
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
4.514.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.22.7
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery1530mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
360 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
170 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
2.43.36
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Eten X500+ has a global score of 35.5, which is a little bit better than Philips 692's 32.9 overall score. Despite being the best we compare here, the Eten X500+ is a much heavier and a little thicker cellphone than the Philips 692. Eten X500+ has a sharper display than Philips 692, because it has a lot better display pixels density, a bigger screen and a way better 640 x 480 pixels resolution.

The Eten X500+ counts with a better processing power than Philips 692, because it has a higher number of cores. The Eten X500+ captures slightly better pictures and videos than Philips 692, because it has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back. The Philips 692 features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Eten X500+, although it has no SD extension slot.

Eten X500+ counts with a superior battery life than Philips 692, because it has 1530mAh of battery capacity.

In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Eten X500+ is also very cheap compared to the other phones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.