Search


Compare phones

Philips 699
Global Score
32.835.9
Basic Information
PhilipsLG
--2008-06-11
4.17 x 2.20 x 0.59 inches4.10 x 2.20 x 0.50 inches
3.45 ounces3.76 ounces
$ 95.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
2.6 inches3 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 400 pixels
TFTTFT
154 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
ResistiveResistive
5.95.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
11,26 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.20
Camera
1.30 MP3.20 MP
320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution
4.515.06
GPRS and GSMEV-DO A and CDMA
SIM, Dual SIM--
0.20.2
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery1100mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
2.5 hours talk time
360 hours standby time
4.7 hours talk time
2.242.72
Other Features
Bluetooth 1.2Bluetooth 2.1
--GPS
--Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The LG Dare is slightly better than the Philips 699, having a score of 35.9 against 32.8. LG Dare's design is a little bit heavier but thinner than the Philips 699. The LG Dare's processor is very similar to the processor in Philips 699, both have a 0-Core processor. LG Dare has a screen that is very similar to Philips 699's display, although the LG Dare also has a quite higher pixels density, a bit higher resolution of 400 x 240 and a bigger screen.

LG Dare features a superior camera than Philips 699, because it has a camera in the back with a lot better 3.2 mega pixels resolution and a lot higher (VGA) video definition. The Philips 699 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than LG Dare, although it has no external SD slot.

The LG Dare features a much longer battery life than Philips 699, because it has a 1100mAh battery size.

The LG Dare not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making it a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.