Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 32.8 | 57.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Philips | ZTE |
| -- | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| -- | 2017-07-14 |
| 4.17 x 2.20 x 0.59 inches | 6.14 x 3.06 x 0.38 inches |
| 3.45 ounces | 6.12 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 95.00 | $ 99.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | -- |
| 154 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 5.9 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 11,26 MB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 320 x 240 (QVGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 6.93 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.2 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 2.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.24 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The ZTE Blade Spark is much better than the Philips 699, with a 57.4 score against 32.8. The ZTE Blade Spark body is a lot thinner but noticeably heavier than Philips 699. ZTE Blade Spark features a really superior processing power than Philips 699, because it has a higher number of faster cores. ZTE Blade Spark has a sharper screen than Philips 699, because it has a way higher display density, a much better 720 x 1280 resolution and a much larger screen.
The ZTE Blade Spark counts with a very superior camera than Philips 699, because it has a way better resolution back camera and a much better 1920x1080 video quality. ZTE Blade Spark has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Philips 699, because it has 16 GB internal memory.
The ZTE Blade Spark features a very superior battery performance than Philips 699, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity against 800mAh.
ZTE Blade Spark costs a bit more money than Philips 699, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.