Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Philips | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 4.17 x 1.81 x 0.71 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 3.14 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 189.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.6 inches |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| -- | 441 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 7,17 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.2 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.63 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 720mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a score of 78.8, which is way better than Philips 755's overall score of 28. Google Pixel 3a's body is way heavier but a lot thinner than Philips 755. Google Pixel 3a features a lot better looking screen than Philips 755, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels.
Google Pixel 3a features a much better processing power than Philips 755, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster). The Google Pixel 3a has a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Philips 755, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3a counts with a way better battery duration than Philips 755, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a way better camera than Philips 755, because it has a lot better 12.2 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Google Pixel 3a not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Philips 755, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.