Compare phones
Samsung Evergreen
SGH-A667
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 29.2 | 39.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Philips | Samsung |
| -- | 2010-11-01 |
| 3.35 x 1.85 x 0.98 inches | 4.56 x 2.20 x 0.59 inches |
| 3.21 ounces | 4.50 ounces |
| $ 59.00 | $ 60.00 |
| 128 x 160 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 71 pixels per inch | 200 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.7 | 6.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 9,22 MB internal memory | 262,14 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.2 | 1.8 |
| Camera | |
| 0.30 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 3.63 | 4.84 |
| GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 400 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 1.92 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Evergreen has a general score of 39.1, which is way better than Philips 855's 29.2 general score. Samsung Evergreen's body is way heavier but incredibly thinner than Philips 855. Philips 855 and Samsung Evergreen count with incredibly similar processing units, they have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Evergreen has an incredibly better looking screen than Philips 855, because it has a way better 320 x 240px resolution and a way better display pixels density. Samsung Evergreen features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Philips 855, because it has 252,92 MB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows up to 16 GB.
Samsung Evergreen features a greater camera than Philips 855, because it has a lot higher resolution camera in the back. Samsung Evergreen features a much longer battery life than Philips 855, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity instead of 600mAh.
The Samsung Evergreen costs a little more money than the Philips 855, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.