Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Plum | |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.94 x 2.56 x 0.46 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6572AW chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1450mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 200 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.2 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is a lot better than Plum Axe II's overall score of 47.4. The Google Pixel 3 body is noticeably heavier but notably thinner than Plum Axe II. Google Pixel 3 has a better performance than Plum Axe II, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a more vivid screen than Plum Axe II, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, a much larger screen and a lot greater pixels quantity per display inch. The Google Pixel 3 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Plum Axe II, because it has a back facing camera with lot more MP.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Plum Axe II, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 60 GB more internal storage. Google Pixel 3 has a much better battery lifetime than Plum Axe II, because it has a 101 percent greater battery size.
Google Pixel 3 costs a bit more than Plum Axe II, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.