Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Plum | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.94 x 2.56 x 0.46 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6572AW chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1450mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 200 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is a lot better than Plum Axe II's score of 47.4. The Galaxy S9 construction is extremely heavier but incredibly thinner than Plum Axe II. The Galaxy S9 features a much better display than Plum Axe II, because it has a way greater pixel count per inch in the display, a really bigger screen and a lot better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Plum Axe II, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 400 GB. Galaxy S9 has a superior hardware performance than Plum Axe II, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S9 features a way better camera than Plum Axe II, because it has a lot better resolution back-facing camera. Galaxy S9 has a really longer battery duration than Plum Axe II, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 1450mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a little more than the Plum Axe II, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.