| Global Score | |
| 47.4 | 51.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Plum | ZTE |
| Android 4.2 | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| -- | 2017-09-19 |
| 4.94 x 2.56 x 0.46 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 5.00 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black |
| $ 155.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 233 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6572AW chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1450mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.2 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
ZTE Tempo X is slightly better than Plum Axe II, having a overall score of 51.7 against 47.4. ZTE Tempo X's design is a lot heavier but extremely thinner than the Plum Axe II. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but the ZTE Tempo X has the newer 7.1 Nougat version while Plum Axe II has Android 4.2 version.
Plum Axe II counts with a more vivid screen than ZTE Tempo X, because although it has a much smaller screen and a little bit worse 800 x 480 resolution, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch of screen. ZTE Tempo X features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Plum Axe II, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 32 GB, the ZTE Tempo X also has 8 GB internal storage capacity.
The Plum Axe II counts with a bit more powerful CPU than ZTE Tempo X, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. ZTE Tempo X has a much longer battery performance than Plum Axe II, because it has a 52% more battery capacity. ZTE Tempo X and Plum Axe II both feature similar cameras, they have a 5 mega pixels back facing camera.
ZTE Tempo X is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.