Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Plum | LG |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.66 x 2.21 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 3.28 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink, Red and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 2.42 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP + 1.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1350mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 780 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Plum Sync 3.5, getting a score of 81.3 against 43.6. LG V35 ThinQ is a notably heavier but a lot thinner cellphone than the Plum Sync 3.5. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a greater processing power than Plum Sync 3.5, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much sharper display than Plum Sync 3.5, because it has a lot bigger display, a much higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG V35 ThinQ captures much clearer videos and photos than Plum Sync 3.5, because it has a camera with a much higher 16 MP resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Plum Sync 3.5, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a much better battery lifetime than Plum Sync 3.5, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 1350mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more than Plum Sync 3.5, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.