Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Plum | LG |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.73 x 2.80 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 3.84 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 860 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is way better than the Plum Sync 5.0's 48 global score. LG V35 ThinQ's design is noticeably thinner but notably heavier than Plum Sync 5.0. The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better looking display than Plum Sync 5.0, because it has a larger display, a way greater screen density and a lot higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Plum Sync 5.0, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a quite better performance than Plum Sync 5.0, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior battery performance than Plum Sync 5.0, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 1900mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ has a much better camera than Plum Sync 5.0, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than the Plum Sync 5.0, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.