Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 88.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2018-10-22 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.24 x 3.11 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 829.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 has a global score of 88.7, which is much better than Razer Phone 2's 70.1 overall score. The iPhone 12 design is much newer, way lighter and thinner than the Razer Phone 2. IPhone 12 comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Razer Phone 2 counts with Android 9.0 Pie OS. The iPhone 12 has a bit sharper display than Razer Phone 2, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density and a little lower resolution of 1170 x 2532, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The iPhone 12 counts with a superior performance than Razer Phone 2, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The Razer Phone 2 features much more storage to store more games and applications than iPhone 12, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Razer Phone 2 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Razer Phone 2 counts with a superior battery life than Apple iPhone 12, because it has a 42 percent more battery size. The Apple iPhone 12 counts with just a bit better camera than Razer Phone 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a same resolution camera and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Apple iPhone 12 also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
The Apple iPhone 12 is a little more expensive than the Razer Phone 2, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.