Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-10-22 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.24 x 3.11 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 is much better than Razer Phone 2, getting a global score of 91.5 against 70.1. Apple iPhone 13 works with iOS 15.x OS, and Razer Phone 2 comes with Android 9.0 Pie OS. The Apple iPhone 13 construction is newer, way lighter and a little thinner than Razer Phone 2. The iPhone 13 counts with a more powerful CPU than Razer Phone 2, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 2 less cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone 13 has a little more vivid display than Razer Phone 2, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels quantity per screen inch and a little bit lower 1170 x 2532 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Razer Phone 2 features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone 13, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Apple iPhone 13 features just a bit better camera than Razer Phone 2, and although they both have the same video quality, a back facing camera with a 12 MP resolution and the same video frame rate, the Apple iPhone 13 also has a bigger aperture. Razer Phone 2 counts with superior battery lifetime than iPhone 13, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3227mAh.
IPhone 13 costs exactly the same than Razer Phone 2.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.