Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 92.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | iOS 16.x |
| 2018-10-22 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.11 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | (Product) RED, Blue, Midnight and Purple Starlight |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple 15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3279mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 has a global score of 92.5, which is way better than the Razer Phone 2's score of 70.1. The iPhone 14 construction is newer, way lighter and a bit thinner than Razer Phone 2. IPhone 14 counts with iOS 16.x operating system, while Razer Phone 2 comes with Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
The iPhone 14 features a better performing processor than Razer Phone 2, because although it has 2 less CPU cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Apple iPhone 14 counts with a bit better looking display than Razer Phone 2, because although it has a little worse 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
Razer Phone 2 has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than iPhone 14, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. IPhone 14 features a bit better camera than Razer Phone 2, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the iPhone 14 also has a larger aperture for better low-light images.
The Razer Phone 2 has superior battery duration than iPhone 14, because it has a 22% more battery capacity.
IPhone 14 and the Razer Phone 2 cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.