Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 6.0 |
| 2018-10-22 | 2015-09-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.11 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 760.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is much better than Razer Phone 2, getting a 79.6 score against 70.1. Despite of the fact that Google Nexus 6P is extremely older than Razer Phone 2, it's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Nexus 6P has 6.0 version while Razer Phone 2 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Razer Phone 2 has a greater processing power than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. Google Nexus 6P counts with a little more vivid screen than Razer Phone 2. Both have a screen of the same size, the same display density and an equal 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Razer Phone 2 has just a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality pictures and videos, a lower resolution back camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Razer Phone 2 features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. Razer Phone 2 features a little better battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Nexus 6P is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.