Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-10-22 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.24 x 3.11 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra is a little bit better than the Razer Phone 2, with a 77 score against 70.1. HTC U Ultra is an older phone than Razer Phone 2, but it is lighter and a bit thinner anyway. Razer Phone 2 features a bit more powerful processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Razer Phone 2 features a bit more vivid screen than HTC U Ultra. They have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the same display pixels density and a display of the same size. HTC U Ultra counts with a better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Razer Phone 2, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The HTC U Ultra has a camera that's just as good as the Razer Phone 2 one, because although the HTC U Ultra has worse video frame rate, and they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution camera, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor. The Razer Phone 2 features longer battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the HTC U Ultra is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.