Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-10-22 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.11 x 0.33 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Holographic white |
| Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Stylo 6 is a bit better than the Razer Phone 2, with a overall score of 76.7 against 70.1. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but LG Stylo 6 has an older 10 version while Razer Phone 2 has Android 9.0 Pie. The LG Stylo 6 design has the same weight than the Razer Phone 2, but it is a little thicker.
The Razer Phone 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Razer Phone 2 has a little faster processing unit than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Razer Phone 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Razer Phone 2 takes slightly better videos and photos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Razer Phone 2 also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
LG Stylo 6 has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Razer Phone 2, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG Stylo 6 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 6's battery performance is just as good as the battery lifetime in Razer Phone 2.
The LG Stylo 6 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.