Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-10-22 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.24 x 3.11 x 0.33 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 799.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto Z2 Force Edition is better than the Razer Phone 2, having a general score of 77.4 against 70.1. The Moto Z2 Force Edition construction is extremely lighter and a lot thinner than the Razer Phone 2, even though it was released just 15 months before. Razer Phone 2 has a little bit better processing power than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Razer Phone 2 also has more RAM memory.
Razer Phone 2 and Moto Z2 Force Edition both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1440 x 2560px resolution, it also counts with a bit better screen density. The Razer Phone 2 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Razer Phone 2 also has faster 60 fps video frame rates, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Razer Phone 2, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Razer Phone 2 features a very superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Moto Z2 Force Edition costs a little more than the Razer Phone 2, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.