Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-22 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.24 x 3.11 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 is a bit better than Razer Phone 2, with a 76.9 score against 70.1. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A70 has an older 10 version and Razer Phone 2 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A70 is a lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than Razer Phone 2, even though both were released with only a couple of months difference.
Razer Phone 2 counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a higher pixel density. Razer Phone 2 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Razer Phone 2 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Razer Phone 2 has a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Razer Phone 2 also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and better 60 fps video frame rates.
The Galaxy A70 has a slightly bigger memory to store more games and applications than Razer Phone 2, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A70 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Razer Phone 2, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A70 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.