Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.1 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-10-22 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.24 x 3.11 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 799.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than the Razer Phone 2, with a 93.4 score against 70.1. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has an older 13 version while Razer Phone 2 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy S22 is a notably newer phone, and it's also notably lighter and just a bit thinner than Razer Phone 2.
Galaxy S22 counts with a more vivid display than Razer Phone 2, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit inferior amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Razer Phone 2 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Razer Phone 2 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S22. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S22 has a much better camera than Razer Phone 2, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Razer Phone 2 counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
The Galaxy S22 costs exactly the same than the Razer Phone 2.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.