Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-11-15 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 has a score of 83.3, which is much better than Razer Phone's overall score of 69.6. The iPhone 11 is a newer and just a bit lighter cellphone than the Razer Phone, but it is just a little bit thicker. IPhone 11 features a little bit better processing power than Razer Phone, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Razer Phone has a little bit better screen than iPhone 11, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a lot greater screen pixels density. Razer Phone features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 11, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Razer Phone also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The iPhone 11 counts with just a bit better camera than Razer Phone, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the iPhone 11 also has a bigger sensor capturing better quality photographs and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Razer Phone features longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
IPhone 11 and the Razer Phone cost exactly the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.