Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 14.x |
| 2017-11-15 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.24 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 4.76 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 477 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 mini is way better than the Razer Phone, getting a general score of 88.5 against 69.6. The iPhone 12 mini design is incredibly newer, just a bit thinner and extremely lighter than the Razer Phone. IPhone 12 mini counts with a more powerful CPU than Razer Phone, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone 12 mini has a bit more vivid display than Razer Phone, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a bit smaller screen and a quite lower screen pixels density. Apple iPhone 12 mini has a bit better camera than Razer Phone, and although they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Apple iPhone 12 mini also has a bigger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments and better video frame rates.
The Razer Phone features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 12 mini, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Razer Phone also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Razer Phone counts with a superior battery performance than iPhone 12 mini, because it has an 80 percent larger battery size.
The iPhone 12 mini costs the same than the Razer Phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.