Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-15 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.24 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has an overall score of 80.3, which is much better than Razer Phone's overall score of 69.6. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a a lot newer device than Razer Phone, although it's heavier and thicker. The Razer Phone counts with a little better hardware performance than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Razer Phone also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Razer Phone has a bit sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display. Razer Phone features a bigger storage to install applications and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Razer Phone also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a little longer battery performance than Razer Phone, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures much clearer pictures and videos than Razer Phone, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality, higher video frame rates and a camera with much more megapixels.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW costs a bit more money than Razer Phone, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.