Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-11-15 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.24 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a score of 76.2, which is a little bit better than Razer Phone's 69.6 global score. Although nubia Red Magic 5S is newer than Razer Phone, it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit better processing power than Razer Phone. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM memory.
Razer Phone features a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a lot better camera than Razer Phone, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
The Razer Phone has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little longer battery performance than Razer Phone, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.