Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.6 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2017-11-15 | 2017-04-28 |
| 6.24 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches | 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 6 is a little bit better than the Razer Phone, getting a 76.5 score against 69.6. The Xiaomi Mi 6 body is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the Razer Phone, although they were released only 7 months apart. The Xiaomi Mi 6 features a bit better looking screen than Razer Phone, although it has a bit smaller screen, a much lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a little worse pixels density.
The Razer Phone counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi 6's processing unit is just as good as Razer Phone's processing unit, and although the Xiaomi Mi 6 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Razer Phone has better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 6 shoots clearer photos and videos than Razer Phone, although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Mi 6 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.