Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Supersonic Black and Supersonic blue | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is better than realme 8 5G, having an 80.2 score against 72. The Google Pixel construction is extremely lighter than the realme 8 5G, but it is just a bit thicker and was released 5 years before. The realme 8 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger display.
Realme 8 5G has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal internal memory, the realme 8 5G also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1 TB. The realme 8 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the realme 8 5G also has more CPU cores.
The realme 8 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2770mAh. Realme 8 5G takes a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the realme 8 5G also has a larger camera aperture and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.