Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Supersonic Black and Supersonic blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than realme 8 5G's global score of 72. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's design has the same weight than the realme 8 5G, but it's thicker. The realme 8 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the realme 8 5G also has a higher number of cores (and also faster).
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a slightly better screen than realme 8 5G, because although it has less brightness and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixels density. The realme 8 5G counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The realme 8 5G has improved battery duration than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Realme 8 5G has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the realme 8 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.