Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-28 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Supersonic Black and Supersonic blue | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.56 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is much better than the realme 8 5G, getting an 80.1 score against 72. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and realme 8 5G has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an older, extremely heavier and way thicker cellphone than realme 8 5G.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better screen than realme 8 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better screen pixels density. Realme 8 5G has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior processing unit than realme 8 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM. The realme 8 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the realme 8 5G also counts with a camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The realme 8 5G features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.