Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-03-20 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.32 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Illuminating Yellow, Infinite Black and Infinite Blue | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 337.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is better than the realme 8 Pro, with an 82.9 score against 70.6. Both phones in this review work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding OS features. Google Pixel 4a is a lighter phone than the realme 8 Pro, but both have the same thickness.
Realme 8 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite larger screen. The realme 8 Pro features a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores.
The Google Pixel 4a and realme 8 Pro both count with quite similar memory capacity for games and applications, both of them have the same internal memory. The realme 8 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Realme 8 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the realme 8 Pro also counts with a camera with much more megapixels.
The Google Pixel 4a is a little more expensive than the realme 8 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.