Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-06-21 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than realme GT 5G's 74.8 score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and realme GT 5G has Android 11. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much newer than the realme GT 5G, it's just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier.
Realme GT 5G has a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a brighter display than realme GT 5G, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a quite bigger display.
Realme GT 5G takes just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited environments and a lot tinier camera sensor taking lot worse quality photographs, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the realme GT 5G also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than realme GT 5G, because it has more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a battery lifetime that is very similar to the realme GT 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.