Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-06-21 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| -- | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than the realme GT 5G's 74.8 global score. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, the Motorola One Hyper design is older, just a little bit heavier and a little thicker than the realme GT 5G. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
The realme GT 5G features a little better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the realme GT 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The realme GT 5G has a little bit better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite higher count of pixels in each display inch.
The Motorola One Hyper features a very superior storage for games and applications than realme GT 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The realme GT 5G has a little longer battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
The realme GT 5G features a slightly better camera than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a 64 MP, the realme GT 5G also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.