Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-21 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30 has an overall score of 79.6, which is slightly better than realme GT 5G's 74.8 global score. The Galaxy A30 is an older phone than the realme GT 5G, but Samsung managed to make it just a little bit thinner and lighter anyway. Realme GT 5G features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme GT 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The realme GT 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a display of the same size, the realme GT 5G also has a little better pixel quantity per inch in the display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Realme GT 5G takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a much larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photographs and a way higher resolution camera.
The Galaxy A30 features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than realme GT 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Realme GT 5G has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A30, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.