Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-21 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than the realme GT 5G, getting an 83.8 score against 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is an extremely older device than realme GT 5G, but it is just a little bit thinner and lighter anyway. Realme GT 5G features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the realme GT 5G also has a little more pixels per screen inch and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than realme GT 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Realme GT 5G features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the realme GT 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
Realme GT 5G captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution, a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos and a way higher (4K) video resolution.
Realme GT 5G has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.