Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-06-21 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.24 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is just a bit better than realme GT 5G, having a 76.9 score against 74.8. The Galaxy A70 design is just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the realme GT 5G, although it was released many years before. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A70 has the previous 10 version and realme GT 5G has Android 11.
Realme GT 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme GT 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Realme GT 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the realme GT 5G also counts with a just a bit higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than realme GT 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 has a battery lifetime that is just as good as realme GT 5G's battery performance.
The realme GT 5G shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the realme GT 5G also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and higher 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.